Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carla Shaw's avatar

The image of the workbook burning is visceral, but what lingers far longer is the quiet truth underneath it: your daughter wasn’t avoiding maths because she didn’t care, she was surviving a system that confused speed with intelligence and struggle with failure.

What your daughter’s teacher did wasn’t lower the bar. He did the opposite. He held high expectations while removing the shame tax that so often comes with learning gaps. Pre-assessing prerequisite knowledge, pulling targeted groups, explicitly naming that misunderstanding isn’t stupidity — these are instructional moves, yes, but they’re also deeply relational acts. They say: I see you, and I’m not giving up on you.

Your link between teacher wellbeing and the capacity to sustain those moves feels absolutely right. In KS3 especially, teaching well is cognitively and emotionally demanding in a way that’s hard to overstate. You’re constantly diagnosing misconceptions, adjusting explanations, managing behaviour, tracking who is quietly lost, and responding to fragile learner identities — often all in the same minute. That work requires working memory, empathy, and patience.

Good luck with your project!

Dr. Nicole Mirkin's avatar

The connection you make between teacher wellbeing and student identity feels absolutely right. When teachers have the bandwidth to see fear instead of failure, kids stop internalizing deficiency and start rebuilding confidence.

Regenerative schools is such a good frame, because learning should grow from nourishment, not survival.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?